Christian Louboutin filed a lawsuit against Yves Saint Laurent last month, claiming that YSL violated Louboutin’s red sole trademark. I totally disagreed with this lawsuit, as the collection featured several shoes, all which were in bold colours and had matching soles. While I can understand that Louboutin wants to protect his red sole, I thought his lawsuit was a load of crap. YSL’s collection feature shoes in several colours, a purple shoe with a purple sole, a green shoe with a green sole, and the aforementioned red shoe with the red sole. Don’t get your knickers in a twist Christian, just get over it.
Anyway, I was very pleased to hear that YSL is now suing Louboutin by saying that they have fraudulently obtained the sole “use” of the red sole (pardon the pun…) and they have no right to claim exclusivity of a red sole. The court papers go on to explain the following:
“Red outsoles are a commonly used ornamental design feature in footwear, dating as far back as the red shoes worn by King Louis XIV in the 1600s and the ruby red shoes that carried Dorothy home in The Wizard of Oz. As an industry leader who has devoted his entire professional life to women’s footwear, Mr Louboutin either knew or should have known about some or all of the dozens of footwear models that rendered his sworn statement false.” (Vogue)
I have to say that YSL have a point here (and I like the snarky remark about Louboutin’s lack of expert knowledge.) While Louboutin should be allowed to protect himself from counterfeits, this YSL situation is clearly not that. I also feel that there should be more than just one “signature” to a brand, I mean, can’t Louboutin depend on his high quality, his designs, and his (tacky) celebrity following to uphold his brand status, rather than simply his red sole? I think he is being a total diva here, and I hope YSL wins this one. Then we can all run out and start footwear collections with red soles. What do you think?